Don’t get me wrong, I am all for conservation of natural resources and reductions in our fossil fuel use (If anything, only to reduce our dependence on foreign oil).
I would love to be able to drive a car that emits NOTHING (other than maybe pure water). However, at this time this is not economically feasible and won’t happen any time soon (without a government mandate).
The whole debate over Global Warming and the role of CO2 in this process makes me a little crazy.
When you apply real science to the question you get a very different answer than the one that most CO2 “crazies” present.
In my opinion working to educate the public about the environment is an admirable use of your time, provided you aren’t out there slinging junk science and using scare tactics to get your message across. This is why most people laugh at Greenpeace because their methods are far too extreme to have any significant effect.
Educating the public using REAL scientific fact, not sensationalism and working for change in government is the way to go (increasing the government fuel economy mandate, working for lower overall emissions standards).
See the video below for some more information about this debate (CO2 and its role in climate change).
Global Warming Debate
Don’t get me wrong, I am all for conservation of natural resources and reductions in our fossil fuel use (If anything, only to reduce our dependence on foreign oil).
I would love to be able to drive a car that emits NOTHING (other than maybe pure water). However, at this time this is not economically feasible and won’t happen any time soon (without a government mandate).
The whole debate over Global Warming and the role of CO2 in this process makes me a little crazy.
When you apply real science to the question you get a very different answer than the one that most CO2 “crazies” present.
In my opinion working to educate the public about the environment is an admirable use of your time, provided you aren’t out there slinging junk science and using scare tactics to get your message across. This is why most people laugh at Greenpeace because their methods are far too extreme to have any significant effect.
Educating the public using REAL scientific fact, not sensationalism and working for change in government is the way to go (increasing the government fuel economy mandate, working for lower overall emissions standards).
See the video below for some more information about this debate (CO2 and its role in climate change).
Source: http://www.demanddebate.com
Manly