See below for a repost of a commentary by Neal Boortz. Original link HERE.
If you vote for her I will officially label you an idiot and possibly no longer on my list of people who have brain matter inside their cranial cavity.
YET ANOTHER HILLARY ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM.
Hillary says that she is tossing the idea of a $5,000 baby bonus. Golly, I wonder why that would be? Truth is, she drove that wreck into the electoral parking lot and it dented far too many fenders.
So … when one income redistribution plan fails, just roll in another. See if this one will do better.
So … here is Hillary Rodham’s latest great idea for a new entitlement program. American Retirement Accounts. Hillary proposes that every citizen have a 401(k)-type retirement account. You can put up to $1,000 annually in the account and the government will match 100% of it (if you make less than $60,000).
How will she pay for this? Taxes!! The $20 to $25 billion cost of this entitlement program would be paid for by death taxes levied on estates of more than $7 million per couple. She says that this will help “narrow the gap” between the evil rich and the “unfortunate” people who don’t have enough savings for retirement.
OK .. rather than going through a long narrative on Hillary’s latest tax-and-spend plan, let me just give you some bullet points.
For every dollar families earning less than $60,000 a year put into their account the federal government will match that dollar – up to $1000. This will be called a “refundable tax credit.”
Refundable tax credits are a scam.
In the mid 1970s I purchased my first home. Builders were having a tough time selling homes back then, so the government instituted a $2000 tax credit for anyone purchasing a newly-built home. This meant that I could take when I filled out my tax return I would subtract whatever I owed the government by $2000, and pay the difference. If my tax liability minus $2000 equaled zero or less, then I simply didn’t pay any federal income taxes, and that was the end of the story.
That is not the way “refundable” tax credits work. With the modern invention of the “refundable” tax credit you once again subtract the credit from the taxes you owe the federal government. BUT … if the tax credit is more than the taxes you owe, the government pays you the difference! In other words, the government uses its police power to seize the difference between the amount of taxes you owed and the amount of your credit from some other individual, and then hands that money over to you.
Income redistribution … pure and simple.
Hillary’s little savings scheme isn’t going to cost the “government,” as she say, $20 to $25 billion. Much of that money is simply seized by the government and handed over.
Now .. if Hillary gets her little entitlement plan passed, let me tell you what the future holds in store. In campaign after campaign Democrats will tell the voters “Vote for me and we’ll increase the contribution limit for your American Retirement Account. Vote for that evil Republican running against me and he will take your money away!
By the way … you don’t have to work to get this handout. Of course if you don’t work, you don’t have income. If you don’t have income you don’t owe income taxes. That would mean that every single non-working person in this country would just have to find $1000 somewhere to put into this account and the government would rush forward to match it with someone else’s money.
Illegal aliens? I don’t know. She hasn’t said yet. Maybe someone will ask this dangerous woman if she plans to set up these accounts for illegals. The answer should be interesting.
Something else interesting: Hillary says that less than half the families in the U.S. have retirement savings accounts. Another lie. Ever heard of Social Security? Now instead of creating this new entitlement program, why not just establish private accounts for each and every poor sap paying into Social Security right now? Oh wait, I forgot. The politicians need those Social Security taxes to fund their vote-buying programs.
Watch this woman. All she seems to be doing lately is coming up with ideas for government entitlement programs … and government entitlement programs are nothing more than wealth redistribution programs. Check your scorecard we have:
Nationalized Health Care.
The Baby Bonus
American Retirement Accounts
Hillary’s idea of government involvement in our children’s education even before kindergarten!
In the meantime … have you heard one single idea from Hillary that would increase your personal freedom? Have you heard one single idea that would decrease the intrusiveness or the power of the Imperial Federal Government? How about one idea that would promote competition in the free market?You’re right … you haven’t.
You haven’t because Hillary Clinton worships the God of Government. This is a woman who feels that there are only a select few in this country who are capable of ordering and living their own lives without guidance from those smarter and more capable than they. This is a woman who believes to the depth of her soul that you can’t exist without embrace of government guiding your every step and picking you up every time you stumble.
To Hillary Rodham Clinton, self sufficiency is a vice.
What’s next? Stay tuned, it should only take a day or two to figure that out.
Manly
2 Comments
So why not instead of use the “things that pour out of your head” in a negative way – show me a candidate that you DO like, and WHY. Everyone can be negative and find negativity. Find the positive and try to HELP people decide a candidate they CAN choose. Since voting is a privilege in this country, show people how to exercise that privilege for the greater good.
Sorry Gary, to me voting is a dual purpose activity. I need to make sure that I can do my part to keep the wrong person out of office. I also need to support the candidate or party that is most similar to my own philosophy on the issues.
I wouldn’t say that any one candidate has come up with everything on my wish list but here are a few things that I like about certain candidates (and which candidates have the opposing view). To give you an idea of where I stand on the issues, see below.
1) Taxation: Most of the Republican candidates have endorsed the tax cuts and pledged an effort to make them permanent if they are elected (this, in contrast with the Democrats which have all stated they will increase taxes or (obviously) be forced to because of entitlements they are pushing). This is the most important issue to me.
So on this list, put Romney, Giuliani and Thompson.
2) Oil company profits, renewable energy, drilling in Alaska: More than a few of the Democrats have stated that they think that we should use an oil industry windfall profit tax to fund research into alternative energy. I strongly oppose this (and most other Robin Hood taxations). To the best of my knowledge, none of the Republican candidates support this.
I support exploratory (or better) drilling in Alaska. Most of the Republicans support this.
3) Universal Health Care: I think that we DO need to constrain the runaway costs in health care but I do not believe that another government program is the answer. I would much prefer market reform than another entitlement program that will just add another tax burden.
Romney supports universal health care coverage but not via another government program. I am unconvinced that universal health care is necessary but if we are going to move in that direction I would prefer to keep the government out of it as much as possible.
I would give this one to Giuliani or Romney if Romney can find a way to accomplish universal coverage through market reform.
4) Spending, balancing the budget: While most republicans see themselves as the party of fiscal responsibility, I think we all know that they have failed to put this philosophy into practice during Bush’s time in office. This disappoints me greatly but it is still a key issue to me. No democrat has convinced me that they are up to the task (and with the entitlement programs they are pushing they won’t be able to do it). However, Giuliani has stated that his priorities are a balanced budget and low taxes).
5) Stem cell research: This one hits pretty close to home for me as my father suffered from Parkinson’s disease. I do believe in stem cell research (even from discarded fetuses). Giuliani supports this (as do most of the Democrat candidates). I do not believe, however that we should harvest fetuses solely for the purpose of research. Scientific advances will most likely end this debate (and remove the need to use stem cells from controversial sources).
6) Abortion: I am basically pro choice as a government policy but pro life personally. I.E. I do not think that the government should be in the business of deciding what women do with their bodies (late term abortions excepted).
Most of the Democrats are pro choice and the majority of the Republicans are pro life. Giuliani is pro choice.
7) Immigration: I am in favor of a more secure border and harsh treatment of businesses that knowingly hire illegals. However, I do favor some path to citizenship (assuming the illegal is required to learn english, etc).
Clinton supports a path to citizenship but I don’t like the fact that she wants to give it away with few requirements.
I am much more in favor of Giuliani’s plan that requires the illegal to learn english and have a steady job.
There are many more positions I could discuss, but that should be a post instead of a comment. I promise, at some point in the future I will get this done. In the meantime, these are my thoughts on some of the key issues.
Manly